193 words (counted). A process needs the passive voice (is stripped, are coated, are bonded) and varied sequencing (first, after which, at the next stage, finally). The overview gives the number of stages, the start and end points, and the branch/loop. Report every stage and every figure on the diagram (80°C, 24 hours, 2 mm, 8%, 140°C), and add nothing that is not shown.
IntroductionThe diagram illustrates the process by which logs are converted into plywood boards.
OverviewOverall, there are ten stages, from the delivery of logs to the dispatch of finished boards. The process falls into two phases, making thin wooden sheets and assembling them into boards, with a loop in which rejected material is burned to heat the soaking water.
Detail — making the sheetsFirst, logs are delivered and their bark is stripped off. They are then soaked in hot water at 80°C for 24 hours, after which each log is turned on a lathe to peel off veneer 2 mm thick. This veneer is cut into individual sheets, which are dried until their moisture content falls to 8%.
Detail — grading, the loop and assemblyAt the next stage, every sheet is inspected and graded. Faulty sheets are chipped and burned in a boiler, and the resulting steam is used to heat the soaking water. Sheets that pass inspection are coated with glue and laid on top of one another, with the grain of each layer at right angles to the one below. The layers are then bonded in a hot press at 140°C, and finally the boards are trimmed, sanded and stacked for dispatch.
Read these from the bottom up and watch what changes: a clear overview, accurate figures or stages, grouping and comparison, and fewer errors are what lift the score. Every sample is full length. An answer under 150 words loses marks for Task Achievement whatever its quality, so never stop short. 🔑 নিচ থেকে উপরে পড়ুন এবং লক্ষ্য করুন কী বদলায়: স্পষ্ট overview, সঠিক তথ্য, grouping ও তুলনা, এবং কম ভুল — এগুলোই Band বাড়ায়। প্রতিটি নমুনা পূর্ণ দৈর্ঘ্যের। 150 শব্দের কম লিখলে লেখা যত ভালোই হোক, Task Achievement-এ নম্বর কাটা যায়।
The diagram shows the process of producing plywood boards from logs.
Overall, there are ten main steps, from the arrival of logs to the stacking of finished boards, and the process includes a loop in which waste wood is reused as fuel.
To begin with, the logs are delivered and the bark is removed. Next, they are soaked in hot water at 80°C for a day. The softened logs are turned on a lathe and peeled into veneer 2 mm thick, which is then cut into sheets. These sheets are dried until only 8% moisture remains.
After drying, the sheets are checked and graded. Any faulty sheets are chipped and burned in a boiler, which produces steam to heat the water. The good sheets are covered with glue and placed in layers so that the grain of each layer is at right angles to the next. Then they are pressed at a temperature of 140°C. Finally, the boards are trimmed and sanded, and then they are stacked ready to be sent out.
The diagram illustrates how plywood is made in a factory from logs.
Overall, the process has ten stages and it starts with logs and finishes with plywood boards. There is also a stage where bad sheets are recycled.
First, logs are delivered to the factory and their bark is taken off. After that, the logs are soaked in hot water at 80°C for 24 hours so that they become soft. Then they are peeled on a lathe to make veneer, which is 2 mm thick, and the veneer is cut into sheets. The next step is drying the sheets until they have 8% moisture.
When the sheets are dry, they are inspected and graded. The faulty sheets are chipped and burned in a boiler, and this boiler heats the water. The other sheets have glue spread on them and are put in layers with the grain at right angles. After this, the layers are pressed at 140°C. In the final stage, the boards are trimmed and sanded and then they are stacked for dispatch.
The diagram shows how plywood is made. There are ten steps in the process.
Overall, the process begins with logs and ends with boards.
First, the logs come to the factory and the bark is removed. Second, the logs are put in hot water for 24 hours, the temperature is 80°C. Third, the logs are peeled by a lathe and it makes veneer 2 mm. Fourth, the veneer is cut into sheets. Fifth, the sheets are dried until 8% moisture.
Then, the sheets are inspected. If the sheets are faulty, they are chipped and burned in the boiler and the steam go to the water. If the sheets are good, the glue is spread on them. After that, the sheets are put in layers and the grain is at right angles. Next, the sheets are pressed in hot press at 140°C. Finally, the boards are trimmed and sanded and stacked for dispatch.
In conclusion, plywood is made in ten steps from logs to boards and the faulty sheets are used for heating.
This diagram is about how to make plywood in factory, it have ten step.
First the logs is come to factory and remove the bark. Then the logs put in the hot water, it is 80°C and 24 hours, because the wood is very hard and need to be soft. Then the machine peel the logs and make the veneer, it is 2 mm, and cut it to sheets. Then the sheets is dry, 8% moisture.
After that the worker check the sheets. If the sheet is bad they make it small chips and burn in boiler and it make steam for the water. If the sheet is good they put glue and put the sheets together, the grain is right angles. Then they press it with hot machine 140°C. Then they trim it and sand it and stack it. Then the plywood is ready for sell in the shop.
So this process is long, it start with the log and finish with the board, and the bad sheets is not waste because they make steam.
Tick each box you can honestly say is true of your answer. The four rows are the criteria an examiner uses — each is worth 25% of your Task 1 band. 🔑 আপনার উত্তরে যেটা সত্যি, শুধু সেই বক্সে টিক দিন। নিচের চারটি সারি হলো examiner-এর আসল criteria — প্রতিটি Task 1 band-এর 25%।
297 words (counted). This is a two-part question, so the essay answers both questions directly: one body paragraph explains the causes, and the next gives a clear evaluation. The writer's answer to the second question (positive) is stated in the introduction and repeated in the conclusion, and the main objection is answered rather than ignored.
Introduction — both answers in briefIt has become increasingly common for athletes, singers and film stars to speak out on issues ranging from racial equality to climate change. In my view, this trend is driven largely by changes in how fame itself works, and while it carries some risks, it is on balance a positive development.
Body 1 — why it is happeningThe most obvious explanation is social media. Celebrities once relied on journalists and publicists to communicate with the public, but they can now address millions of followers directly, with no editor deciding which comments are suitable. A second factor is audience expectation. Younger consumers in particular often prefer to support personalities whose values match their own, so remaining silent on a high-profile controversy can itself be interpreted as a statement. Finally, many public figures come from communities affected by the issues they discuss, and they feel a responsibility to use their platform on behalf of people whose voices are rarely heard.
Body 2 — positive or negative?Critics argue that fame does not confer expertise, and that a footballer's views on economic policy deserve no more attention than anyone else's. This is a fair point, and celebrities have at times spread misleading claims to vast audiences. However, the same objection could be made against any citizen who takes part in public debate. In a democracy, the right to a political voice is not restricted to those with formal qualifications. Moreover, celebrity campaigns can reach people who never follow political news; when a popular athlete speaks openly about mental illness, for instance, fans who would ignore a government leaflet may finally seek help.
ConclusionIn conclusion, the rise of celebrity activism reflects both new technology and changing public expectations. Although audiences should judge such campaigns critically, I believe that the willingness of famous people to engage with serious issues does more good than harm.
Notice the climb: a clear position that answers the exact question, ideas that are developed rather than listed, logical paragraphing, precise vocabulary, and complex sentences with few errors. Every sample is full length. An essay under 250 words is penalised under Task Response, and Task 2 counts twice as much as Task 1. 🔑 ধাপগুলো লক্ষ্য করুন: প্রশ্নের সঠিক উত্তর দেওয়া স্পষ্ট position, শুধু তালিকা নয় — developed ভাবনা, যুক্তিসংগত প্যারা, নির্দিষ্ট শব্দ, এবং কম ভুলে জটিল বাক্য। প্রতিটি নমুনা পূর্ণ দৈর্ঘ্যের। 250 শব্দের কম লিখলে Task Response-এ নম্বর কাটা যায়, আর Task 2-এর ওজন Task 1-এর দ্বিগুণ।
These days, it is common to see famous sportspeople, musicians and actors campaigning on political and social issues. I believe there are several reasons for this trend, and overall I consider it a positive development.
One major reason is the growth of social media. In the past, celebrities could only share their opinions through interviews, but now they can post messages to millions of followers instantly and without any filter. Another reason is that fans increasingly expect the people they admire to share their values. Many young people, for instance, prefer to follow celebrities who speak about environmental protection or equal rights, so public figures may feel that staying silent could damage their reputation. In addition, some stars grew up in poor or marginalised communities, and they want to support people facing the same difficulties.
Some people argue that this is a negative trend because celebrities are not experts. A singer may have strong opinions about immigration or the economy without understanding the details, and because of their large audience, inaccurate information can spread very quickly. This is a genuine concern.
Nevertheless, I believe the benefits are greater. Famous people have every right to express their opinions, just like any other citizen, and their influence can bring important issues to the attention of people who normally ignore politics. When a popular athlete speaks about mental health, for example, it can encourage fans to seek help and reduce the stigma around the subject.
In conclusion, celebrity activism has increased mainly because of social media and changing expectations among fans. Although the public should think critically about what famous people say, I believe this development is mostly positive.
Nowadays many celebrities, such as footballers, singers and actors, often talk about political and social problems. There are some reasons why this is happening, and I believe it is generally a positive change.
The main reason for this trend is the internet. Celebrities now have their own social media accounts with millions of followers, so it is very easy for them to share their opinions about any topic. In the past, they needed newspapers or television to do this. Another reason is that famous people want to show that they care about society. If a celebrity supports a good cause, such as protecting the environment, their fans will respect them more, and this can also help their career.
On the one hand, some people believe this is a negative development. Celebrities are not politicians or scientists, so they may not have enough knowledge about the issues they discuss. If they give wrong information, many fans will believe it without checking, which can be dangerous.
On the other hand, I think the positive side is stronger. Celebrities are also members of society and they have the right to give their opinions. Moreover, because they are so popular, they can make people pay attention to serious problems. For example, when a famous singer talks about poverty or mental health, young people who usually do not read the news may start to learn about these issues.
In conclusion, celebrities are speaking about social issues mainly because of social media and because they want to show they care. Although there are some risks, I believe it is a positive development overall.
In modern world, many famous people like sports players, singers and actors are talking about politics and social problems. I think there are some reasons for this and it is mostly a positive thing.
The first reason is social media. Every celebrity has Facebook, Instagram and other accounts, and they have a lot of followers. So when they want to say something, they can post it very easily and many people will see it. The second reason is that celebrities want to be popular. When they support a social issue, people think they are good person and they like them more. For example, some actors give money to poor people and post the photos online.
There are some negative points about this. Celebrities are not experts in politics, so sometimes their opinion is wrong. But their fans believe everything they say, so the wrong information can spread to many people. Also, some celebrities only do this for publicity, not because they really care.
However, I think there are more positive points. Celebrities can help people to know about important problems. Many young people do not watch news, but they follow celebrities on social media. If a famous person talks about the environment, these young people will learn about it. Also, celebrities have money and power, so they can really help to solve some problems.
In conclusion, celebrities are talking about social issues because of social media and because they want to be popular. In my opinion, this is a positive development because it helps people to learn about important problems.
Now a days, celebrity is very famous and many people follow them. Some celebrity like cricketer and actor is talking about politic and other problem in society. In this essay I will discuss why it happen and it is positive or negative.
The reason is the celebrity want more fans. When they talk about problem in society, the people think they are very good and kind, so they get more fans and more money. For example, one famous actor in my country start talking about the road accident and after that his followers become double in one month. Also the social media is very easy, everybody can write anything in Facebook. So the celebrity also write their opinion there.
I think it is positive and also negative. It is positive because the celebrity can help the poor people, for example some actor give money for flood victim. It is very good thing and other people also learn from them to help. But it is negative because some celebrity does not know about politic and they say wrong thing. Then their fans fight with other people in the internet and it is make big problem.
Also some celebrity talk about politic only because the political party pay them money. This is very bad and the government should stop this. The celebrity should only do their own work like playing cricket or acting in the movie.
In conclusion, celebrity talking about society problem is have positive and negative side. Celebrity should be careful when they talk because many people follow them.
Tick each box you can honestly say is true of your essay. These four rows are the examiner's criteria — each worth 25% of your Task 2 band. Task 2 counts twice as much as Task 1 in your overall Writing score. 🔑 আপনার essay-তে যেটা সত্যি, শুধু সেই বক্সে টিক দিন। এই চারটি সারি examiner-এর criteria — প্রতিটি 25%। সামগ্রিক Writing Score-এ Task 2-এর ওজন Task 1-এর দ্বিগুণ।